SOC 2 evidence checklist
A SOC 2 examination is decided by evidence: the records your controls leave behind when they run. This page lists 130 evidence items across the 38 criteria this site maps, grouped by series and linked to the policy that documents each one. Download the whole list as a CSV and use it as the skeleton of your evidence folder.
What counts as evidence
Evidence is anything that shows a control was designed as described and, for a Type II report, that it actually ran. In practice that means tickets, dated exports, configuration screenshots, signed forms, review records, logs and meeting notes. A policy is evidence that a control was defined and approved; it is not evidence that the control operated.
The useful split is between design evidence and operating evidence:
- Design evidence (Type I and Type II). Shows the control exists and is set up the way you say it is: the approved policy, the branch protection setting, the MFA enforcement rule, the backup schedule. A Type I report is an opinion on design at a single point in time, so this is most of what it needs.
- Operating evidence (Type II). Shows the control ran throughout the observation period: the access reviews for each quarter, the pull requests with approvals, the onboarding tickets, the restore tests. It has to come from inside the period and be dated, which is why it cannot be assembled at the last minute.
See Type I vs Type II for what else changes between the two report types.
How auditors sample
For a Type II examination the auditor rarely looks at every instance of a control. They ask for a population, pick a sample from it, and request evidence for each item in the sample. The terms are worth knowing because the requests are phrased in them:
- Population. The complete list of times a control should have run during the period: every new hire, every leaver, every production change, every quarterly review. You produce it, usually from the system of record, and it has to be complete, because the sample is only meaningful if nothing was left out.
- Sample. The items the auditor selects from the population. For each one you provide the evidence that the control operated: the approval, the deactivation timestamp, the reviewer sign-off.
- Period. The window the report covers. Evidence dated outside it does not count, and a control that runs less often than the period, such as an annual risk assessment, still has to have run inside it.
Sample sizes depend on how often a control runs and on the CPA firm’s own methodology, so ask your auditor rather than relying on a number from the internet. Controls that run rarely, such as an annual review, are often tested in full. Automated controls, such as an enforced configuration, are usually tested by inspecting the setting and how changes to it are controlled, rather than by sampling occurrences.
How to organize an evidence folder
The structure matters less than being able to find any item in a minute when the auditor asks. A layout that works for most small teams:
- One folder per criterion or per control. Using the criterion ids, for example
CC6.2, keeps the folder aligned with the checklist and the auditor’s request list. If one control covers several criteria, file it once and reference it from the others. - Dated file names. Put the date the evidence was produced at the start of the name, for example
2026-07-01 access review production.pdf, so the period coverage is visible without opening anything. - A tracking sheet. One row per evidence item with the owner, the cadence, the location and the date last collected. The CSV on this page has the first columns; add the owner and cadence for your company.
- Populations kept next to samples. Store the full list of hires, leavers or changes for the period alongside the evidence for the sampled items, so you can show the population was complete.
- Restricted access. Evidence often contains employee names, system configuration and customer details. Share the folder only with the people who need it and the audit team.
Common evidence gaps
The same problems come up in most first examinations, and almost all of them are about timing rather than missing tools:
- Controls that only exist in the policy. The policy says access is reviewed quarterly, but the first review happens during fieldwork. A written commitment your own records contradict is worse than no commitment.
- Undated screenshots. A screenshot with no date or system name cannot be tied to the period. Capture the URL, the account and the date in the image, or export from the system instead.
- Incomplete populations. An offboarding list that misses contractors, or a change list that misses infrastructure changes made outside the main repository.
- Approvals recorded after the fact. A ticket approved after the access was granted shows the control did not run in the order the policy describes.
- Annual controls that never happened. Risk assessment, vendor review, policy review, security training and restore tests are easy to forget because they come around once a year.
- Missing acknowledgments. Staff who joined mid-period without signing the policies; see policy acknowledgment for how to close this one.
- No vendor reports on file. Critical vendors with no SOC 2 report or questionnaire collected; see where to get vendor SOC 2 reports.
The evidence checklist, by series
Each table lists the criteria in one series, the evidence a small SaaS company can realistically produce for each, and the policies that document the control. The rows come from the same crosswalk the generator and the Audit Kit use. Follow a criterion for its own page, or a policy for the section an auditor would read. The evidence items are examples: your controls decide what your auditor will actually request.
CC1 Control environment
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC1.1 Integrity and ethical values |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P02 Acceptable Use Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
| CC1.2 Oversight by leadership |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC1.3 Structure, reporting lines and authority |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC1.4 Competent people |
| P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
| CC1.5 Accountability |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P02 Acceptable Use Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
CC2 Communication and information
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC2.1 Quality information |
| P05 Asset Management Policy, P12 Logging and Monitoring Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC2.2 Internal communication |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P13 Incident Response Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
| CC2.3 External communication |
| P13 Incident Response Policy, P16 Vendor and Third-Party Risk Management Policy, P22 Privacy and Data Protection Policy |
CC3 Risk assessment
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC3.1 Objectives for risk assessment |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC3.2 Identifying and analyzing risks |
| P16 Vendor and Third-Party Risk Management Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC3.3 Fraud risk |
| P03 Access Control Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
| CC3.4 Changes that affect risk |
| P09 Change Management Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
CC4 Monitoring activities
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P11 Vulnerability and Patch Management Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC4.2 Communicating deficiencies |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P13 Incident Response Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
CC5 Control activities
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC5.1 Selecting control activities |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC5.2 Technology controls |
| P03 Access Control Policy, P09 Change Management Policy, P20 Network and Infrastructure Security Policy |
| CC5.3 Policies and procedures |
| P01 Information Security Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
CC6 Logical and physical access controls
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC6.1 Logical access security |
| P03 Access Control Policy, P04 Authentication and Password Policy, P08 Encryption and Key Management Policy, P20 Network and Infrastructure Security Policy |
| CC6.2 User registration and deprovisioning |
| P03 Access Control Policy, P18 Human Resources Security Policy |
| CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege |
| P03 Access Control Policy |
| CC6.4 Physical access |
| P21 Physical and Remote Work Security Policy |
| CC6.5 Disposal of physical assets |
| P05 Asset Management Policy, P07 Data Retention and Disposal Policy, P21 Physical and Remote Work Security Policy |
| CC6.6 Protection from external threats |
| P04 Authentication and Password Policy, P19 Endpoint and Workstation Security Policy, P20 Network and Infrastructure Security Policy |
| CC6.7 Data in transit and on removable media |
| P06 Data Classification and Handling Policy, P08 Encryption and Key Management Policy, P19 Endpoint and Workstation Security Policy |
| CC6.8 Malicious software |
| P10 Secure Software Development Policy, P11 Vulnerability and Patch Management Policy, P19 Endpoint and Workstation Security Policy |
CC7 System operations
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC7.1 Detecting vulnerabilities and configuration changes |
| P11 Vulnerability and Patch Management Policy, P12 Logging and Monitoring Policy, P20 Network and Infrastructure Security Policy |
| CC7.2 Monitoring for anomalies |
| P12 Logging and Monitoring Policy, P13 Incident Response Policy |
| CC7.3 Evaluating security events |
| P12 Logging and Monitoring Policy, P13 Incident Response Policy |
| CC7.4 Responding to incidents |
| P13 Incident Response Policy |
| CC7.5 Recovering from incidents |
| P13 Incident Response Policy, P14 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy, P15 Backup and Recovery Policy |
CC8 Change management
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC8.1 Change management |
| P09 Change Management Policy, P10 Secure Software Development Policy |
CC9 Risk mitigation
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| CC9.1 Mitigating business disruption risk |
| P14 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy, P15 Backup and Recovery Policy, P17 Risk Assessment and Management Policy |
| CC9.2 Vendor and business partner risk |
| P16 Vendor and Third-Party Risk Management Policy, P22 Privacy and Data Protection Policy |
A1 Availability
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| A1.1 Capacity management |
| P12 Logging and Monitoring Policy, P14 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy, P20 Network and Infrastructure Security Policy |
| A1.2 Environmental protections, backups and recovery infrastructure |
| P14 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy, P15 Backup and Recovery Policy, P21 Physical and Remote Work Security Policy |
| A1.3 Recovery testing |
| P14 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy, P15 Backup and Recovery Policy |
C1 Confidentiality
| Criterion | Evidence to collect | Policies |
|---|---|---|
| C1.1 Identifying and protecting confidential information |
| P06 Data Classification and Handling Policy, P07 Data Retention and Disposal Policy, P22 Privacy and Data Protection Policy |
| C1.2 Disposing of confidential information |
| P05 Asset Management Policy, P07 Data Retention and Disposal Policy, P22 Privacy and Data Protection Policy |
The common criteria, CC1 through CC9, apply to every SOC 2 report. Availability (A1) and Confidentiality (C1) only apply if you put those categories in scope. For the controls that produce this evidence, see the SOC 2 controls list; for the questions that come up when the auditor walks through your policies, see what auditors ask about policies.
Frequently asked questions
- Is there an official SOC 2 evidence list?
- No. The AICPA publishes the Trust Services Criteria, not a list of documents. The auditor decides what to request based on the controls you describe, so the evidence list for your examination comes from your own control set. The checklist on this page is a starting point mapped to the criteria, not a request list from any CPA firm.
- What is the difference between Type I and Type II evidence?
- A Type I report covers the design of your controls at a single date, so the evidence shows that a control exists and is set up as described: an approved policy, a configuration screenshot, a walkthrough. A Type II report covers whether the controls operated over a period, so the evidence has to show the control running throughout that period: dated tickets, review records and logs from across the whole window.
- Can I create evidence after the fact?
- No. Evidence has to be produced when the control runs. A quarterly access review written up months later, or a training record backdated to fit the period, is not evidence that the control operated. If a control did not run, the honest answer is to say so; the auditor will treat it as an exception either way.
- Do I need a compliance platform to collect evidence?
- Not necessarily. Many small companies keep evidence in a shared folder organized by criterion or control, with a spreadsheet that tracks owner, cadence and where each item lives. A platform can automate collection from your tools, but the auditor tests the evidence, not the system it is stored in.
- Who should own evidence collection?
- Each control should have an owner who produces its evidence as part of running it, for example the engineering lead for change review or the person who runs onboarding for access requests. One person usually coordinates the folder and the auditor's requests, but evidence collected by someone who does not run the control tends to arrive late and incomplete.
Policyseed provides governance policy templates and AI tailoring. It is not legal advice and not a compliance guarantee. Management adopts the policies; the CPA firm performs the SOC 2 examination.